Why am I Doing My Thesis? An Explorative Study on Factors of Undergraduate Thesis Performance in Indonesia
Abstract
Writing an undergraduate thesis is a formidable task, especially in Indonesia where writing is not engrained in its culture. Therefore, this study aims to explore the internal and external factors in writing an undergraduate thesis. A qualitative research design was used. Phase 1 used an online questionnaire (n= 143) to find encouraging and obstructing factors. Phase 2 used an in-depth interview (n = 48) to validate findings from Phase 1. A general inductive approach was used to analyze data. Phase 1’s findings were students’ perceptions about undergraduate thesis and categories of encouraging and obstructing factors in writing a thesis. Writing undergraduate thesis was more driven by external factors (e.g.deadlines, others' expectations) than by internal factors. Neglect of writing the thesis, however, was caused more by internal factors (e.g. lack of knowledge and skills, doing other activities). Phase 2’s findings validated phase 1’s findings which consist of 11 encouraging and 8 obstructing factors.
Keywords: Undergraduate thesis performance, undergraduate research,  writing a thesis, university students, qualitative exploratory study
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustiningsih, R. D., Cahyadi, S., & Susiati, E. (2017). INTERVENTION DESIGN TO CHANGE SUBJECTIVE CONTROL AND VALUE IN STUDENTS WITH ENGAGEMENT AT THE LOWER LEVEL IN THESIS WORK ACTIVITY (Vol. 13). Retrieved from http://pustaka.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Rika-Dwi-Agustiningsih.pdf
Ariely, D. and K. W. (2001). Procrastination, Deadlines, And Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(2000), 219–224. Retrieved from http://erationality.media.mit.edu/papers/dan/eRational/Dynamic preferences/deadlines.pdf
Arlita, Cahyadi, S., & Yuanita, R. A. (2017). Intervention Design To Overcome The Lack of Thesis Behavioral Engagement Student on Faculty of Psychology Unpad (Universitas Padjadjaran). Retrieved from http://pustaka.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Arlita.pdf
Baker, S. E., Edwards, R., Adler, P., Becker, H. S., & Doucet, A. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough ? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling Expert voices. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper.
Bandura,Albert. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–26. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&%2338;AN=4369846&%2338;site=ehost-live
Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students. International Journal of English Study, 10(2), 79–97.
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Y5836060002.Pdf. 15(1), 1–40.
Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitaive, and Mixed Mthods Approaches. In Muqarnas (Third, Vol. 8). https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157
Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native Graduate Students’ Thesis/Dissertation Writing in Science: Self-reports by Students and Their Advisors from Two U.S. Institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9
Lane, J., Lane, A. M., & Kyprianou, A. (2006). Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem and Their Impact on Academic Performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.3.247
Meisenberg, G., & Woodley, M. A. (2012). Is it smart to believe in God ? The relationship of religiosity with education and intelligence É inteligente acreditar em Deus ? A relação da religiosidade com. Temas Em Psicologia, 20(June 2014), 101–120.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Moore, S. E., Hvenegaard, G. T., & Wesselius, J. C. (2018). The efficacy of directed studies courses as a form of undergraduate research experience: a comparison of instructor and student perspectives on course dynamics. Higher Education, 76(5), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0240-7
Pekrun, R; Frenzel, A: Goetz, T; Perry, R. (2007). The control-value theory of achieved emotions: a interactive approach to emotions in education. Emotions in Education, 13–36.
Reynolds, J. A., & Thompson, R. J. (2011). Want to improve undergraduate thesiswriting? engage students and their faculty readers in scientific peer review. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127
Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj1102063
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Trockel, M. T., Barnes, M. D., & Egget, D. L. (2000). Health-related variables and academic performance among first-year college students: Implications for sleep and other behaviors. Journal of the American College Health Association, 49(3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480009596294
Ursia, N. R., Siaputra, I. B., & Sutanto, N. (2013). Academic Procrastination and Self-Control in Thesis Writing Students of Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v17i1.1798
Verdinelli, S., & Scagnoli, N. I. (2013). Data display in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200117
Wangid, N. ., & Sugiyanto. (2013). Permasalahan, Skripsi. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 19–28.
Wardi, R., & Ifdil, I. (2016). Stress Conditions in Students Completing Thesis. GUIDENA Journal, C(2), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.24127/gdn.v6i2.512
Wentzel, K. R. Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and Social Motivational Influences. Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022137619834
Yin, H. (2018). What motivates Chinese undergraduates to engage in learning? Insights from a psychological approach to student engagement research. Higher Education, 76(5), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0239-0
Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research : thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1311–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1024635
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v10i2.19912
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.